Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Baggett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  00:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

David Baggett

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

subject is non-notable and should be deleted as per several similar cases in this discussion. David Baggett has no first-class cricket connection although the article has tried to infer this. BlackJack | talk page 21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't think of any notable living cricket statisticians, other than Bill Frindall. Lordrosemount 22:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete - He is not notable as a statistician nor as an umpire so I do not see a reason for keeping this.Brusegadi 01:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing offered here implies notability. Nuttah68 15:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per notability concerns, plus a lot of it is OR (apparently the editor got some of the info by speaking directly to the subject?) JCO312 17:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.