Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Banney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

David Banney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure if this orphaned article is independent notable and my searches found nothing particularly good aside from this and this. Nothing suggests improvement for this which has stayed the same since December 2005. SwisterTwister  talk  19:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 05:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep subject of numerous independent reliable sources. Refs now supplied.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The only good source is the recent article on him by 1233 ABC Newcastle, a local media outlet. I think we would need something more than that. Being covered in regional (provincial) media once doesn't seem to fulfill WP:BIO, nor WP:COMPOSER. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - it seems to be approaching WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.