Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bayne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

David Bayne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet either GNG or PROF. John from Idegon (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 20:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Article makes no real claim of notability for much more than existing, and the only non-primary source brought to bear at all is his WP:ROUTINE obituary in the local newspaper of the place where he was living at the time he died. A more substantive and better-sourced article might be possible, given some of the details suggested in the obituary, but none of it grants him an exemption from having to be properly sourced. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if enough media coverage can be found to get him over a notability bar for something. Bearcat (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. can be recreated if more information is ever forthcoming — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 05:00, 30 January 2016‎


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.