Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boulton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

David Boulton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. I don't see any independent sources with any significant depth. Daask (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping as contributor to this article. Daask (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing stated in this brief summary of me and my work that is untrue or misleading. I am not an actor. I am not a filmmaker, though I did produce and direct the Children of the Code documentary. I have no idea why anyone would want to delete this page? 2600:1700:9831:60B0:19D6:FBD8:3050:AF4B (talk) 23:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, it's sourced to your biography, so if anything is incorrect, I'd start there first. It's being looked at for deletion as we only have primary sources. Oaktree b (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing stated in this brief summary of me and my work that is untrue or misleading. I am not an actor. I am not a filmmaker, though I did produce and direct the Children of the Code documentary. I have no idea why anyone would want to delete this page? 2600:1700:9831:60B0:19D6:FBD8:3050:AF4B (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping . IIRC I just passed through and gave it a quick cleanup while fixing underlinked tags. If there are no other independent sources to enhance the article and make it less self-promotional then I Support deletion. ZettaComposer (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I am new to Wiki page procedures, may I request an extension of time to compile more independent resources. I am familiar with David Boulton and his work and feel confident we can update the page. David Boulton is currently ill with Covid and my correspondence with him is delayed. Is there a "specific" objection to any statements on the page or just a general lack of "independent sources with any significant depth" Kevin Kevin Manley (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Vote to KEEP. Not sure any objections are clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Manley (talk • contribs) 14:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Several hits on the name that I find, none that seem to be about this individual however. We only have primary sourcing or non-RS now in the article, so not much for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: before search does not produce positive result to demonstrate notability. Search result brought up several different things not related to the information about the subject here. Metroick (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.