Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Brog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

David Brog

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not that many sources, most are small websites focused on the Jewish-American/Israel sphere. One is literally a YouTube video. Not really any national in-depth coverage. Brog doesn't seem to have done anything or gotten the necessary coverage to determine notability. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Brog has been notable for a long time, primarily through his leadership of CUFI, and to a lesser extent on account of his recent congressional race. These have been covered in state-level publications including Nevada Independent, national publications including The Forward and Fox, and international publications like Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Haaretz and the AP. Several of these are Jewish publications, but that has no bearing on RS. Freelance-frank (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, Buzzfeed News, Vox, and other RS covered Brog's participation in organizing the National Conservatism Conference. Freelance-frank (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Here are examples of the longest RS coverage most specifically centered on Brog at different times and contexts:
 * Role in CUFI and general profile, The Nation, 2006, note that there are 3 additional pages listed at the bottom:
 * Role in Maccabee Task Force, The Forward, 2015:
 * Role in national conservatism, Buzzfeed News 2019-present:
 * 2022 Congressional campaign, article also gives significant general background The Forward:
 * Freelance-frank (talk) 21:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Conservatism,  and New Jersey.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. There is not enough significant coverage outside of Brog's unsuccessful primary campaign to merit a WP:GNG pass. GPL93 (talk) 18:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism, Israel,  and Palestine. Freelance-frank (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep if Brog had been just a failed candidate for elected office, the article would be deleted, but he's more important in his other roles. See, for example, this article in Tablet (magazine), not yet mentioned or this in Methods of Studies in Religion. He's also the author of a number of books that, while to me not very interesting, have collected some reviews or articles about them.--Jahaza (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. The sourcing presented by Freelance-frank and Jahaza is easily enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV. Sal2100 (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The coverage about Brog is in-depth and in reliable and verifiable sources. The significant coverage is about him and his various roles, not merely about a political race. The notability standard is met. Alansohn (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable with valid sources, significant coverage. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 02:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.