Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bruno Jasiulewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

David Bruno Jasiulewicz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I put this up as a PROD and it was contested, so here we are. Completely unsourced BLP fails WP:BLP with respect to the lack of references, and also fails WP:SOLDIER with respect to notability. Generating notability under WP:SOLDIER requires that military members who seek to show notability by winning the second-highest honor (here, the Navy Cross) must be awarded it multiple times. This individual was awarded it once. Of course, there may be other claims to notability, but I was unable to find any credible sources suggesting further reasons why this person has achieved encyclopedic notability. The only references to this person in third-party sources I can find are passing references to somebody of the same name and approximate age in police reports for various petty offenses: and. If those are even the same person, they don't create notability nor are the adequate references to support this otherwise unreferenced BLP. I'd be happy to be wrong about this one if there are additional reasons for notability and reliable third-party sources to back it up -- but I haven't seen them yet. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced. Come back when there are some sources and we can discuss it more. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Then there is | this request by one calling himself David Bruno Jasiulewicz to delete the thing. I gave him some advice on the matter. Dloh  cierekim  17:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Firstly, subject is non-notable. Secondly, article contained negative unsourced BLP material-- now removed. Thirdly, unsourced BLP's must be deleted. Fourthly, removal of BLP-Prod tag from unsourced article was improper. Dloh  cierekim  18:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced article on a military person who does not meet the notability requirements for military people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails NOR, V. Smmurphy(Talk) 00:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SOLDIER. No evidence of notability. Unsourced BLP. If the subject objects to material, that makes it contentious, and the material must be removed unless properly sourced. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.