Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Budworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

David Budworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Largely unsourced (the sources generally aren't about David Budworth) and apparently written by a family genealogist of the Budworths. Though I'm sure this is of great interest to David Budworth's relatives, it isn't suitable for Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG (and WP:V). Sionk (talk) 05:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:OR and WP:GNG issues. Much of the content is about turbines/etc., not about him. I don't see anything that would warrant his inclusion in an encyclopedia. Not all engineers are notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   06:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   06:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist talk&#124; contribs  09:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- largely unsourced original research and a tribute page. Article does not establish notability and significant RS coverage is not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.