Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David C. Teague

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 02:35, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

David C. Teague
Non-notable, vanity. Delete or move to Userpage GTBacchus 8 July 2005 17:50 (UTC)

Has this been cosidered for deletion because of Vanity or Jealousy?

How do you exclude the year 1960-1980 years of hipsterism on your site in favor of fifeteen years of mediocrity? Hipster of 1990 onward are more "Hippie" than the real hippies were in the 1970's. (unsigned comments by 69.104.76.195)


 * Dicussion of the hipster article should take place at Talk:Hipster. See you there, Mr Teague? GTBacchus 8 July 2005 18:21 (UTC)


 * Delete nn vanity. Note also David C.Teague, up for deletion. --Etacar11 8 July 2005 18:03 (UTC)
 * Cleanup vanity and POV as written, but with cleanup, he's at least worth a stub for his work on Sabrina. In much the same way as WP:MUSIC, I would expect that having 3 DVDs that are a spin-off of a popular TV show is worthy enough for inclusion. -Harmil 8 July 2005 19:39 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Kappa 8 July 2005 22:47 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, vanity. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  July 9, 2005 00:23 (UTC)
 * Userfy, I'm sure you're a talented dude, but thousands of people are employed in the entertainment industry working on well-known projects.... that doesn't make those people themselves notable. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 01:29 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 9 July 2005 03:40 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. DS1953 July 9, 2005 18:05 (UTC)
 * Delete. You qualify for IMDB, sir, but not enough notability for here. --Calton | Talk 02:17, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy. An impressive resume does not translate to notability. --Misterwindupbird 06:55, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Good enough for imdb... Redwolf24 06:57, 16 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.