Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carleton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

David Carleton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article about a non-notable person. Suspected undisclosed paid advocacy, see Sockpuppet investigations/Delzem. MER-C 21:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I simply see nothing better. Pinging tagger and also  who may be interested to comment.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Thank you David, for uploading your resume to wikipedia. MiracleMat (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.