Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carter Casamayor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleted. No, it technically isn't a speedy (certainly not an A7), so, Whstchy, for shame! But, really, chaps and chapettes, let's face it: it could be deleted by someone acidentally believing the speedy tag, or it could be deleted as a hoax, or it could be deleted by AfD saying "no evidence of notability", or ... whatever happens, though, by the end of the week it will not still be here. So why not save some poor fellow the trouble of deleting it in a few days, eh? fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 11:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

David Carter Casamayor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Zero non-wiki ghits. No evidence of notability (or existence) offered in article. Previously prodded, but prod was contested. Kathy A. 22:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7, will be tagged in a moment. And from the talk page "There's very little about him on Google (something on about Page 12 or so, lol) but that's my point." nuke it. Whsitchy 22:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, send down brimstone and fire on the article. --  Random  Say it here! 22:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as utterly unnotable (if ineligible for speedy). Nothing, nada, zilch on Google News Archive for various combinations of david.carter+keyword, so fails WP:V. --Dhartung | Talk 22:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-admittedly non-notable.  tomasz.  23:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable. ~EdBoy[c] 00:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- might be a hoax -- his parents don't get any google hits either even though they're supposedly listed as very wealthy in Forbes magazine. He is also not listed on the ABA directory that I can see.  Sci girl 01:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.