Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Catterall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

David Catterall
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

IMPORTANT - THIS ARTICLE IS DIFFERENT TO A PREVIOUS ARTICLE LISTED BELOW, SAME NAME BUT FOR A DIFFERENT PERSON. Blatant advertising and self promotion. Not notable enough to get an article in an encyclopaedia. Most edits are by one named account and 2 prominent anon account who only work on this article and others linked to it. Note that edit history of all three contributors are almost identical. Anons are suspected sockpuppets or others having conflict of interest. Added speedy delete on 10th June, but this was removed minutes later without reason given by another user. Dmol (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak Delete just running hotels and/or being in a cover band doesn't confer notability. References all appear to be primary source, trivial, or press releases. So he fails both WP:N and WP:VJasynnash2 (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka++ 18:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N as there are no independent secondary sources which cover the person. Assize (talk) 10:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Strong hints of self-promotion and appear to be no sources outside press releases and marketing material Murtoa (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.