Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Cole (revisionist) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SNOW Tone 11:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

David Cole (revisionist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

DELETE AGAIN. This article was apparently deleted in a previous AFD and then since recreated. The subject still doesn't appear to be any more notable, so I'm not sure why that was allowed to happen. JBsupreme (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Was it actualy deleted after fist AfD ? WP:CSD? Codf1977 (talk) 12:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was. See the talk page of the article for a little more explanation. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:Notability and WP:RS. Not sure if it meets WP:Stub requirements.


 * Delete - there are some reliable sources available, such as from the Anti-Defamation League, and  from Google Books. However, I cannot find enough significant coverage in reliable sources to justify an article per WP:BIO. Robofish (talk) 17:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insignificant coverage in reliable sources. Laurinavicius (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It should be noted that following the AFD that brought about this article's deletion, this article was restored upon the request of User:Pottsf, an individual who regretfully exhibits some denier tendencies. That point aside, there is not enough coverage from reliable sources to establish notability per WP:BIO, and since the subject has recanted his Holocaust denial, having an article on him is a BLP can of worms. WilliamH (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There's a clear lack of reliable sources to establish notability here. I wouldn't have restored this, but since at least two of the "delete" voters last time around was evading a block or a ban, I guess it can't hurt to run another AfD and do it right this time. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - some coverage, but not enough to pass the notability guidelines. Also, the fact that it was previously deleted by AfD, as others have noted, does not help its case.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  15:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.