Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Denholm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 06:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

David Denholm
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Re nominating as last AfD has no participants. Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep When he won a prize for his first novel, it was covered in the Sydney Morning Herald. The novel was also then published in Britain and in the U.S.  These were under a pen name.  The book of hisotry under his own name garnered praise.  And Australian literature professors consider him notable..  He clearly passes WP:CREATIVE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've expanded the article and linked it up a bit. Some impressive things have been written about his work .E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep unambiguous notable as an author.  DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.