Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Denton S.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

David Denton S.C.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There doesn't seem to be anything particularly notable about this barrister. Sure, he's headed a few legal groups but there doesn't appear to be any secondary sources on him. The article's tone is inappropriate in places and is likely written by someone with a WP:COI. Mvjs  Talking  09:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Delete I concur that there seems very little that makes him notable, and it wants badly for secondary sources. It's clearly been created by someone close to the subject, and given the Rumpole link between the creator and the subject, I think it could well be autobiographical. Murtoa (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have removed some of the more non-notable elements of the article and requested sources for some of the claims. Murtoa (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete - I found many Google News results, but the first page only has trivial mentions, and everything after the first page is about other David Dentons (esp. those in South Carolina). -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.