Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Durham (fugitive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

David Durham (fugitive)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Believe this is a case of WP:BLP1E Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete. Willing to reconsider if User:Llywrch, or some other editor, can find coverage of him that is 2 out of 3: ongoing, intensive or geographically broad.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Mmm. Well, I found this recent article: . There might be others. JMWt (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * News coverage in 2011 went on for a few weeks, my Proquest news search on "David Durham" + police + Oregon turned up 25 articles, all from Oregon papers. They include reports of a false lead and the fact that they found his dog.  Also articles about the wounded officer returning to duty, all from the winter/spring of 2011.  There was an article on the one year anniversary of the incident.  Repeated the search on google news and got a few more hits, many false, many duplicates, . also this one sorted by date .  I'm just not seeing that much coverage.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - per WP:GNG. per sources mentioned above and in the article.BabbaQ (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.