Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David E. Henderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. User-requested with this edit. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

David E. Henderson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Although the article content is currently blanked pending an ongoing discussion of copyright status, there's the deeper problem that was identified by Theroadislong on the talk page: it's difficult to verify any of the information in the article. This is the PR biography of the subject, who has become quite angry and attacking over this issue and a related issue at Kit Bigelow. I think the right thing to do is delete this article without prejudice against someone independent of the subject recreating it at some future date if he's in fact notable. Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment To be clear, the article refers to the "Author, Journalist, Communications Strategist, Brand Journalism Advisor" not the chemist of the same name. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable as far as I can see (the chemist isn't obviously notable either). --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.