Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David E Woodley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No quorum (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

David E Woodley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject appears to fail WP:BASIC (our general notability criterion for biographies) and, I suspect, all secondary guidelines as well. No sources currently presented in the article appear to even verify the subject exists, and all I could find online was IMDB, which I could login and edit if I wished (hence it fails WP:RS). VQuakr (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's not a good quality article, but the person definitely exists and is a minor, but notable enough, actor. I looked at the WP article about his Home and Away character Joel Nash, and that has two reliable source references for him. Wittylama 20:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:24, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


 * the two sources at Joel Nash are, a primary source from the show's website; and , a book on Australian soaps in general. I do not have access to that book online, but it supports no information about Woodley whatsoever in the Nash article. Neither one meets the requirements listed at WP:BASIC. VQuakr (talk) 03:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.