Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

David Eager

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable person.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)  -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep From the sources he seems to be important enough to be considered notable.Borock (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * But according to WP:ANYBIO he is not notable enough for WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't think he passes WP:PROF (the most likely criterion is #C7, impact outside academia in his academic capacity, but we'd need sources documenting the actual impact he has made) nor WP:GNG. The sources are a mixture of self-published ones (e.g. his university web sites) and reliable news articles that are not actually about him, but mention him in passing or quote him. I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep for his role as a regulator. David E and I usually agree about academics; this is one of the borderline cases where we sometimes do not.    DGG ( talk ) 21:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak delete borderline article, possible WP:COI on part of creator. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ACADEMIC; Google scholar finds very few articles with very few cites, and he is only an associate professor at UTS. Fails WP:BIO; I could not find anything at all about him at Google News Archive. --MelanieN (talk) 23:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.