Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Evan Syatt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

David Evan Syatt
First year journalism student who had some articles printed in the university paper. Pure vanity piece at best, and it smells like a hoax. People are also playing games regarding the deletion   and on the article Talk: page  using false edit summaries. Jayjg (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator; 2 google hits. One, if you discount the Wikipedia link.  RFerreira 21:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tevildo 21:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * article should be renamed "David Syatt"; will not fall under deletion per nominator
 * Delete per nom- even under David Syatt I feel this will fail to meet criteria for notability. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 23:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is either being vandalized or hoaxified, but the fact that the article describes Syatt as a professor while Syatt's own college newspaper articles describe him as a college freshman does not bode well for the article's accuracy. --Metropolitan90 06:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Indeed. The creators first claimed his birthdate was 1987,  and then days later changed it to 1957, perhaps because they realized a 1987 date would be incompatible with their claim that he was a college professor. It's looking more and more like a hoax. Jayjg (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as being non-verifiable and most likely a non-notable hoax. Yamaguchi先生 19:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  03:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator - has already been speedied once Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.