Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David F. Huntzicker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

David F. Huntzicker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am unable to find a reference, but this previously was listed for AfD and a decision was made to retain the article. Although I don't think the argument is a slam dunk, I think the subject has sufficient coverage to be notable and that the article has encyclopedic value.--Rpclod (talk) 11:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * When was this article ever previously listed for AfD? I don't believe it was. Joeykai (talk) 06:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I just recall cleaning up the article when it was in bad shape and thought that it was under AFD. I also looked for an AFD reference and did not find one. So maybe my recollection is faulty or perhaps the article name changed?  I don't have any personal connection to the subject or to the University of Michigan or to ice hockey (I see ice as a concussion waiting to happen).  My 2¢ is that the subject has enough coverage and the article has enough encyclopedic interest to warrant keeping under GNG if not the latest revision of NHOCKEY, but I understand arguments to the contrary.--Rpclod (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - even if this was previously listed as a keep in a past AfD, WP:NHOCKEY has gone through quite a drastic change. Mostly, it made the presumption standards higher.  Since we cannot see it, even under WP:GF, I don't think the previous AfD carries much weight.  The sources for GNG just aren't there. RonSigPi (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources that allow for it to meet GNG. And it doesn't meet NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete He doesn't meet anything at WP:NHOCKEY and coverage consists of routine sports reporting, the local paper, and/or U. of Michigan websites--nothing to show WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.