Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Forrester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

David Forrester

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Basically seems like a cv of a person who is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Cannot find objective sources that really confirm the relevance of the subject. Sheroddy (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe delete unless this can actually be improved as my searches found nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep -- Permanent under-secretary is the senior civil servant in a department, which may just about make him notable, but there is no indication of what he did in that role. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * He wasn't permanent under-secretary; he was under-secretary, the rank below. A permanent secretary is certainly notable, but I'm not so sure about an under-secretary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches turned up nothing to show they meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -Reliable sources not found to establish notability. He may have been under-secretary, but as noted there is very little published about him in that role. ABF99 (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.