Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Greco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 04:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

David Greco

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO Suitship 21:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; unencyclopedic tone, dubious notability. Yechiel Man 22:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - aspiring racecar driver awaitng financial backing. --Evb-wiki 00:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand any of this, why has this been started in the first place? This makes absolutely NO SENSE. There are so many ridiculous things going into Wikipedia everyday and this guy comes along after falling off his wagen and says the Greco page should be deleted. And now there is support for the notion? This is a mean spirited attack by someone who first hid behind an IP address and now two other people are agreeing with him. Wow. Amazing.R H Pearson 02:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia's notability requirements. --Evb-wiki 02:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead then, you win. Please empty my user and talk pages while at it. I am done here. We know who we are and what we are currently achieving. We do not need wikipedia to justify ourselves. Congratulations to he who feels this is a moment worth celebrating. R H Pearson 02:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please also see Wikipedia's guidelines concerning conflicts of interest while you're at it. --Evb-wiki 02:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. fails WP:BIO. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because it isn't well written and isn't notable. — Wenli 02:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not a notable driver, just an aspiring one. Delete per Wikipedia is not a soapbox Ohconfucius 09:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I find all of this a curious personal attack now. This page has been here for well over a year and the comments made here are that it is not well written (a personal attack on me) and the driver is not notable comment is a personal attack on David Greco. I think that someone who has actually raced cars is notable, and I think that wanting to continue the career is worthy of mention. There are many other drivers who have pages who are in similar situations but we don't see their pages nominated for deletion do we? R H Pearson 13:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Can you link to any other such "aspiring" drivers in junior formulae? I'll personally consider a driver notable once he reaches a race seat in Formula 3 or a test seat in GP2.  A test in FR isn't notable.  It's not personal, I'd hold all drivers to this simple standard.  -- Suitship 02:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Has anyone considered suggesting a re-write? Would that make it work? 24.202.85.2 19:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as aspiring is really non-notable. When he gets backing, then he can get an article. Bearian 02:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep this guy has made races already, has had results. He aspires for more. What is wrong with that? Rprm2007 11:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - aspiring, but not yet there driver. Didn't compete in 2006 and not likely in 2007 either.  And no reliable sources to boot. -- Whpq 14:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.