Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Henderson

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was move to user space.

"What links here" clearly shows that there are several notable David Hendersons. This does not appear to be the person cited in any of those articles. Rossami (talk) 21:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

David Henderson
Self-promotion from User:Dehenderson. May be notable--journalist with one published book--but self-posting flies in the face of Autobiography, What Wikipedia is not #6, and "Please do not create an article to promote yourself, a website, a product, or a business (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not)." prominently displayed on every 'new article' edit window. Niteowlneils 15:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * keep notable Chubby Chicken 15:47, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Above recently created account, Chubby Chicken, is voting "keep, notable" for numerous clearly non-notable (indeed bordering on speedy) articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 talk 20:22, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
 * Delete It might be notable, but it is violation of policy.  It would be more convincingly notable if someone else thought he was worthy of an article.  Sonic Mew 15:51, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy He's borderline notable, but given that it appears to have come from him, I'd say userfy to User:Dehenderson. --Xcali 17:23, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy You 19:19, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:05, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Sonic Mew. Karol 10:39, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .