Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ho (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. T. Canens (talk) 04:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

David Ho (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Deleted. Fails WP:BLP and WP:N, with a distinct lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 15:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. Certainly seems from the article like he may have sufficient notability, but the best coverage I found was Daily Review article, Locus Magazine online, Infinity Plus review of one of his books. --Michig (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;He was one of the winners of the 2009 MacWorld digital art gallery and the 2003 International Digital Art Awards. Not sure how notable those are. He is the artist who painted the cover for the Omen (album) album. There appear to be plenty of other sources available to demonstrate notability.&mdash;RJH (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Awards and Books sections appear to speak of notability, for me. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Award winning artist. Artw (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per other Keepers - although it is necessary to add some citations, as this is currently an unsourced bio. BOZ (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as winner of multiple awards and recognitions. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 04:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Just another in a string of IDONTLIKEIT nominations by the same user. Hooper (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Please remember to assume good faith. The nominator makes no such request for deletion based on not liking the article subject.  freshacconci  talk talk  21:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.