Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hogan (missionary)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete JERRY talk contribs 02:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

David Hogan (missionary)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A missionary in Mexico, but lacks any notability. Jmlk 1  7  07:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and Stubify. While the article as it stands is no good at all, and the man is a very marginal case(and a complete kook), he does pass the "multiple non-trivial" test as evidenced by this very restrictive Google news archive search. Lobojo (talk) 13:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Dubious assertions; lots of factual uncertainties. Delete w/o prejudice for better article to be written. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 18:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hut 8.5 12:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete looks like it was made to be the biography on someone's webpage. so it violates WP:NOT Doc Strange (talk) 14:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I actually don't think he even passes the notability test. He has a significant internet presence, however, I don't see independent reliable sources covering him in a non trivial way. Even the hit cited about do not, to be, appear to qualify. Xymmax (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, violates WP:SOAP. Bearian (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep While the man does not get much coverage from mainstream sources that have written him off a priori because of the extreme nature of his lifestyle and claims, he does get a tremendous amount of attention from Christian groups all throughout the internet, making him very notable. DavidPesta (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.