Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to David Icke .  DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

David Icke, the Lizards and the Jews

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Surprisingly, given the involvement of the notable Jon Ronson, I found zero Google news hits for this film, and no WP:RS. Google did reveal plenty of hits on Torrent sites; Google, YouTube and plenty of other online video sites, discussion forums as well as irate mentions on some right wing hate sites. But I'm just not seeing the RS to indicate notability.... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTFILM does allow for cases where the film in question "features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career." The nominated film does satisfy the first part of that criteria, though not the second... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If others agree, I'd suggest a merge and redirect to either Jonson or Icke's bio article? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)




 * Comment Using the actual title (above) gives a number of hits. Adding Ron's name to the mix narrows the results slightly..  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – the Google news search using the actual title delivers enough material to establish notability – but move Redirect to the actual (short) title The Secret Rulers of the World. --Lambiam 00:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC) 15:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sheesh, what a mess: Secret Rulers of the World already exists and does seem to be notable. Soon as I can get this withdrawn, let's redirect the nominated page to the older more comprehensive article on the whole series. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete for now, and redirect to David Icke or Secret Rulers of the World. There's no point retaining it if it doesn't have any content. If someone can find sources to fill it out, we can always recreate it at that time. SlimVirgin  talk  contribs 01:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to existing Secret Rulers of the World, section Season 1, Episode 2: David Icke, The Lizards and The Jews. No reason for a seperate article when the information is far better covered in the series article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect as properly researched above, to main article on the series. sheesh is right. what a waste of precious time for us lizard beings trying to overthrow the govt.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to David Icke or Secret Rulers of the World to avoid WP:CFORKs. IZAK (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect as per IZAK above. -- Pump me  up  14:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedily redirect this, per SNOW etc, and close the AfD. Rich Farmbrough, 12:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Keep or Merge with Secret Rulers of the World. The piece covers the significant work of both Icke and Ronson. Ronson achieved wider coverage on the back of the series. Icke fans and detractors were given a platform to discuss their views, allowing the viewer to make their own opinion. Anthony of the Desert (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)