Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lane (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

David Lane (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable (by Wikipedia standards) article on an obscure person. Also Wikipedia should not be an advertising media for an obscure local lawyer or plumber Vowvo (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is based on trivial mentions of the lawyer, as well as one primary source. The Rocky Mountain News website is probably not reliable on its own to prove notability either. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. He was the subject of a full-length profile in The Denver Post, but I don't see anything else substantial. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete It seems like there's some passing mentions in articles about cases he was involved in. Plus there's the Denver Post article. I don't think it's slightly under enough for him to be notable though. That said, I'm willing to change my vote if another in-depth article about him can be found. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There are many non-notable lawyers who happen to represent a highly notable client from time to time. Textbook WP:NOTINHERITED. BD2412  T 23:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.