Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Look


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tyrenius (talk) 00:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

David Look

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete fails WP:BIO  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I would say merge with Only (magazine), but the article has no information to merge.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely nothing here approaching WP:BIO. Probably should have been speedied. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Johnbod (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.