Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lorenzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

David Lorenzo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article. I have checked out the references, and they are mentions in passing or press releases at best. Nothing found elsewhere. Edwardx (talk) 20:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Lorenzo is the author of three books. His latest book is titled The 60 Second Sale and will be published by John Wiley & Sons - a worldwide publisher of business books. The book's ISBN is 9781119499763.

Argument against deletion: Lorenzo is an expert on sales. He is the published author of three books the most recent due out in July 2018 and published by large United States publishing house. I have edited the page to reflect this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrencedaniel1999 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Removed the promotional paragraph about development of a legal marketing system for lawyers. LawrenceDaniel1999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrencedaniel1999 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - borderline spam, heavily promotional article about person who does not meet WP:NAUTHOR nor WP:GNG. Maybe he is an expert on sales, but that's not part of any of Wikipedia's notability criteria. Most published authors are not notable according to Wikipedia's definition. --bonadea contributions talk 18:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment the article stinks of promotional editing. I don't see any good references that support a keep, apart from the 40 under 40, it's press releases, Youtube videos, blog posts by him, etc. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 00:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.