Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David M. Morris (historian)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Big Dom  06:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

David M. Morris (historian)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was created by the subject in 2009 and has remained as an unreferenced biography of a living person ever since. I have been unable to find any reliable sources to support the subject's notability, which I find surprising, given the number of articles quoted. Only sources availble online appear to be self-published. This needs more eyes on it. CharlieDelta (talk) 07:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —CharlieDelta (talk) 07:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * delete &mdash; clearly fails WP:PROF. i can't even construct a google scholar search that picks out this guy's work.  his publications are almost uniformly from the ensign (see also wp article Ensign (LDS magazine)), which is not a scholarly journal even in the circumscribed area of mormon self-scholarship.  since wp:prof doesn't apply, he'd need to satisfy gng, but he clearly does not. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Fails GNG  Teapot  george Talk  15:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete At this point he is a long way from being notable. He has only published in church-sponsored publications, does not appear to have an academic appointment anywhere, and only got his PhD last year. --MelanieN (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.