Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David McDonnell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   04:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

David McDonnell
Unsourced article, written mostly by anon editors and User:Dmcdonn4 (subject??) Contested prod, possible CSD:A7, but sending to Afd for discusssion as borderline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinRe (talk • contribs) 23:42, 16 August 2006


 * Delete per nom. John254 02:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  02:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and as a surprisingly well written hoax. Stu   ’Bout ye!  07:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax again. feydey 09:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong/speedy delete. Vanity and/or NN. This article probably qualifies for a speedy delete, and could legitimately be flagged with . Guliolopez 10:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, probable hoax. NawlinWiki 14:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - vanity. --Ryano 15:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hardly verifiable. Creator is obviously subject of the topic. --Thunderhead 21:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete NN and Vanity Dodge 01:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.