Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Mimran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

David Mimran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable producer. Of the provided sources, all of the coverage in the film-industry related sources is mere-mention and/or WP:ROUTINE. The coverage in the business-related pieces are either mere-mentions in articles primarily about his inherited company, or coverage in press-releases in industry publications (thus not independent).The only in-depth coverage is this NYPost article, which would make this borderline WP:BLP1E, and about something that's unambiguously negative. If kept, the amount of due weight that would need to be given to what is by coverage the most notable coverage of the subject would make this practically an attack article. signed,Rosguill talk 03:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:57, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:57, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep (and I am a deletionist). The subject is listed in the infoboxes of the various films that he co-produced, and that is a form of notability.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Per subject's producer credits. Finnishela (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Robert, I came to the article through random selection.TechGeekRon (talk) 23:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.