Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Murphy (reporter) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

David Murphy (reporter)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable local weatherman; no real claim to notability. First AFD in 2006 closed with no action taken, seemingly because of socking by the nominator (who was also the article creator), although it's not entirely clear and there were plenty of delete votes. Subject is just as non-notable now as he was then. Hairhorn (talk) 01:47, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dhartung's comment in the first AFD: "Delete unless expanded. Al Roker was once a local weatherguy, too (but at the NBC home station) and then he became Al Roker. This guy hasn't become anything yet." Nyttend (talk) 02:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless a trove of independent sources can be produced explaining the subject's notability. Also, there's only one reference in this article. Maybe I'm only viewing an excerpt of it, but from what I see, it doesn't say a word about David Murphy. — Zujine |talk 07:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear spambio. Largely unreferenced. Tijfo098 (talk) 10:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.