Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Nesenoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Following the astute reasoning of DGG. Randykitty (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

David Nesenoff

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Spam target.  scope_creep Talk  19:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep this article looks notable to me. I do dare someone to go after Hendrik Sumendap and Raymond Cottrell these two men aren't notable, and never will be. Catfurball (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * What makes him notable?  scope_creep Talk  22:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep What makes him notable is the significant coverage he has received in independent, reliable sources. This New York Times article and also this Los Angeles Times article are the first two references I checked. He is clearly notable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Close it. Nomination Withdrawn.  scope_creep Talk  09:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)   scope_creep Talk  17:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor filmaker, whose notability is ONEEVENT, related to Helen Thomas. Refs1-3 and 20 through 35 refer only to the encounter with Thomas. Refs 15-19 aretrvial coverage or non-third party sources. The only sources worth serious consideration is 14.LATimes and possibly 13 NYT. Refs 8,11 & 12 are the local edition of theNYT, an no more significant than any other local paper.If kept,. the material other than the filmmaking should be deleted or shortened, with a link to the article on Thomas. With respect to her, its a noteworthy even (though the article is overdetailed and citebombed), but not with respect to him. Some of the comments above are "other stuff exists". And, most of all, I cannot figure out the nefarious motivation in the "pattern".  DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a clear case of one event notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BLP1E applies. Fails WP:GNG. KidAd  •  SPEAK  05:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Week keep, for the reasons given to keep this. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.