Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I believe there is a rough consensus favoring deletion. I also note that WP:PAG based arguments seem strongly weighted towards that end. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is written as though it were an advertisement for subject and his company. Subject of article doesn’t have in-depth significant coverage in reliable source. References provided are just repetitions of themselves and non discuss subject in detail. Fails WP:BASIC & WP:GNG Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Ther appears more than enough to meet the GNG here. The uN Idea fair win alone is probably enough for notability. Several of the cited dources are interviews, but contain significant coverage in the editorial voice befoe the start of the Q&A, and there is enough even without any of these. I removed some promotional writing from the article, nd it could use further improvement, but I see no reason to delete. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 08:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The problem with this article is no reference provided for subject has in-depth significant coverage in reliable source that establishes notability hence doesn’t scale WP:GNG The only sources I see mostly discuss his work in passing & not him. if you do find sources that show notability of the subject do provide it at this AFD. Furthermore the article is written as though it were a resume & advertisement. Celestina007 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps the writer was overwhelmed by the conduct, works and input to community and national development by a 22 year old who was once considered a failure by his class teacher. Hence, I see no reason to delete. Teebabalola (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have heard a lot about his works and innovations and i personally is impressed by the devotion of a Nigerian youth towards development irrespective of the risks attached. As as said, the UN idea fair, Leap Africa Fellowship and Eco-E product are enough for notability. Celestina007 i respect your beautiful and very intelligent opinion but you know, "A man is celebrated because of his works, his works define him". This man was given the this priviledge because of his works which led to numerous interview sessions  and as we can see indeptly, the sited interview sources contained straight forward significant coverages of the editorial input even before further questioning of the subject. Promotional writings may not have been intentional but since they all have been removed from the article by DESiegel then i believe we can give this a pass as i see no reason to delete.
 * Delete Not enough WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:GNG and even if Adeyemi did meet notability standards it is clearly a WP:PROMO article (Keep vote above highlights likely WP:COI issues) that needs to be WP:TNTed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment  it should be noted that &  are yet to produce in this AFD reliable sources that discuss subject of AFD with in-depth and establishes his notability. AFD’s arent about how many keeps or delete votes but substantiating your votes with reliable sources (if you claim he/she is notable enough for inclusion) I am upholding  view; there isn’t enough WP: SIGCOV to show subject of our discussion is notable yet. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON Celestina007 (talk) 13:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILL, WP:RS, and WP:TNT. I don't see how anything the subject has done is beyond what thousands of other business people have done as well, every day. It's not entirely clear what product or service he's created to improve other people's lives; marketing doesn't count. Almost every human being has been told by at least one teacher that they'd be a failure -- that's a trope, not a claim to notability. The sourcing is if dubious provenance. It's so poorly written ("his grandpa...", what specifically is he marketing) that an entire re-write will be necessary. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearian. I must also point out that none of the awards the subject won are notable.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 00:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.