Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David P. Levin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per #1 (non-admin closure) Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

David P. Levin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources. Pizzole (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC) *Redirect and merge to MTV Sorry, we can't find no more about Mr. Levin. Google show only 200 results and a lot of these are from social. I see no news and no newspaper talking about it.(Pizzole (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)) Nominator does not get to !vote a second time. Feel free to comment.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - And would request a speedy close. Rather transparent retaliatory nomination for my vote on his article, Articles for deletion/Internet Horror Movie Database, and most likely my pointing out his pretty obvious use of the stick. Which I am sure he will once again engage in.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep,  establishes him as a co-author of a published book,   establishes "Hollywood.com" as RS for the claims made at  etc.  There are some worthless sources in use (like the NYT one used), but the claim made by the OP is incorrect, and the person clearly meets WP notability requirements. Collect (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sources aren't reliable and from poor websites. There are Blogs, link to Amazon and resources no more available. (Pizzole (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC))
 * Really? And you nominate multiple articles for deletion without making any notifications to people? You find the "first African-American letter carrier" is "not notable"?  You find a person who was a Dean of Dartmouth and a college [resident "not notable"?  An assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations is "not notable"?  The publisher of the major reference work on artists is "not notable"?  And all of the articles you rapidly find are just accidentally written by those who say the brand-new Italian horrordatabase site should be deleted?  Accidentally?  You, sir, are a vandal in the old Roman sense of the word. Collect (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Please excuse me, Onel5969, you can delete my last vote (Redirect and merge). It was a mistake. (Pizzole (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC))
 * Comment - Can't delete it, but did strike it through, which is the proper procedure. And please, take my suggestion to heart about withdrawing your recent spate of nominations targeting editors who didn't agree with your position on the Horror article. That would really help begin re-establishing your good faith.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm in good faith, Onel5969. It's not a debat about me but about the article.(Pizzole (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as this is sourced and seems acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  19:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly passes the GNG just from sources in the article, and more could be found. Very well known directory and producer. No plausible reason for deletion or redirection. DES (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: sufficient reliable sources exist to verify that subject meets WP:BASIC. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ Pizzole (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.