Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Peterson (executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

David Peterson (executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS. No significant coverage about sports or business career; only significant source online is the Anthony source in the article, which is not significant coverage (one paragraph about the subject), and, being derived from a donation to the school, is arguably not independent either. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 07:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople,  and United States of America. North America1000 09:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not finding SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources. Cbl62 (talk) 05:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable NCAA division II football player. Even most Division I football players are not notable, in other divisions it is extremely rare to find someone who is notable for that, and this person's business endevors do not amount to notability either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with Cbl62 and Johnpacklambert. Non-notable player, and he may end up as a notable alumni eventually, he's not there yet. C. Bowers (talk) 19:56, 28 June 2022
 * Delete seems to be a reasonalby common name so basic online searches contain a lot of noise and I therefore have to go with the sources in the article. They seem to all be related to the subject (the college athletic department hall of fame/etc.) or behind a paywall so I cannot evaluate the sources.  I'm unable to confirm passing WP:GNG or any other measure.  Based on the article as it is written, I'm not seeing any notability measure to effectively apply.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete:Unreliable sources. Non notable peraon. DavidEfraim (talk) 14:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.