Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Phillips Vincent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

David Phillips Vincent
At the very least this is WP:VAIN and when reading through you get the impression that it is a WP:HOAX David Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 01:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - The nomination is compelling. And Google seems to come up dry. Probably hoax, but if not vanity. Williamborg (Bill) 01:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable, appears to be a hoax. -- Vary | Talk 01:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete —  reeks of hoax American Patriot 1776 02:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a really bad hoax or a really bad joke. I can't really tell.  The author did go all out, though - s/he even uploaded an image.  Srose   (talk)  02:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  This fails a lot of things. If there is such fame it should be verifiable. Crossmr 03:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Obvious vanity article. Possibly other flaws, but I'm going to stick with the one I know. Heimstern Läufer 04:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete For nine months, Vincent practiced relentlessly for the prize he so dearly desired, and frankly, deserved. Danny Lilithborne 04:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant hoax. Mr Stephen 08:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant hoax. David Phillips Vincent gave me 1 Ghit which was actually about David Phillips and Vincent someone and thus unrelated. I suggest speedy now we know the claims to notablity are fake. - Mgm|(talk) 08:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Had me for a while, it was only when I looked up Silo Amalgamated, which scored precisely 0Ghits then it hit me.Deleteper nom. Ohconfucius 15:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.