Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pollock (music producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

David Pollock (music producer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't meet notability guidelines for Music Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - two references and three external links to unreliable sources (personal web pages). Pollock is mentioned three times in the first reference, but it's a CD review for a non-notable band that says nothing about Pollock himself, just the CD.  Not even clear if it's the same guy.  Can't access the second.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:CREATIVE. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 23:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets minimum criteria for WP:CREATIVE being that "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." He has recorded/mixed/produced at least two albums which fit this criteria, with references in the article. Untick (talk) 12:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest that the albums the references link to a)aren't notable enough albums for their producer to gain notability from and that b)the references don't mention the subject in anything but passing Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: trivial 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.