Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Liu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

David R. Liu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Although a professor in Havard with published papers in notable periodicals, the article doesn't appear to meet the criteria for notability. -- HighKing ++ 19:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Snow keep. Massive citation counts on Google Scholar (h-index 68, easily passing WP:PROF) and a named professorship at the Broad Institute (WP:PROF) as well as earning tenure and a full professorship at Harvard (no mean feat, but not a notability criterion). Nomination statement shows no evidence of understanding WP:PROF (hint: it's not what or where you publish, it's what other academics do based on your publications) nor of checking it in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per David Eppstein. Dr. David R. Liu has very good coverage in Google Scholar. 05:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Genome$100 (talk)
 * Keep Passes WP:PROF &mdash; cnzx ( talk  &#8226;  contribs ) 05:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.