Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Reo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. While there hasn't been any comment for two weeks, earlier commentators have showsn that the referencing isn't up to par to meet our guidelines &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

David Reo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Heavily ref-bombed. Google Books and Google News return only false positives. Sources are CD Baby, YouTube videos, IMDb, and other Wikipedia articles, and nothing that constitutes a reliable source. Seems to fail WP:GNG. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Change to Delete - Needs work, but seems to meet notability guidelines. A simple search online shows articles from present back to the 70s from RS.  Subject has written music for multiple major shows, and has been written about. Caffeyw (talk) 05:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm finding only name drops. Nothing that says anything about him other than that he exists. Care to prove me otherwise? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - After re-checking it seems the search engine was confusing my search for "David Reo" for a search on REO Speedwagons member Dave. Thus, the article from the 70s seem to be the only notable article, when excluding results for REO Speedwagon's member.  Sorry, with both being music related I didn't catch the difference.  Caffeyw (talk) 06:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 04:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.