Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rolfe (singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

David Rolfe (singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to establish notability for the subject aside from only one award with multiple unsourced statements, citing two Wikipedia articles which cannot be done, a video interview and a print interview with the subject without using any third-party independent reliable sources. The creator of this article (who has since been blocked for abusing multiple accounts) also included on their user page here that they were "only here to add a David Rolfe page.", potentially indicating they created it to promote the subject due to their connections to the Pokemon franchise said subject has worked on. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Guitarist in the Pokemon song (per the Billboard link) isn't notable. This is all I find, which doesn't add anything to notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga, Advertising,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Cannot locate more reliable sources to establish notability. Esw01407 (talk) 11:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: This article is a mixture of both Dave Rolfe who works at WPP/Hogarth, and the singer David Kos Rolfe . So the article is wrong, altogether. DanHops123 (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nomination. InDimensional (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Cannot reliably be improved as further coverage is nonexistent. Samoht27 (talk) 06:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Further reading has lead me to see various points of article contain unsourced claims and information. This further strengthens the case for Deletion. Samoht27 (talk) 06:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.