Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rudiak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core des at 03:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

David Rudiak
According to the article, "best known as investigator of the Roswell UFO incident and other UFO cases." I find some internet chatter on him but all of three Newsbank news articles: I can post the articles if anyone is interested in fleshing this out and sourcing, but if not it should be deleted. ~ trialsanderrors 22:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Daily Times, The (Farmington, NM) - April 3, 2005 (passing mention as a speaker)
 * Albuquerque Journal (NM) - November 23, 2002 (passing mention halway through the article: "A UFO researcher, David Rudiak, claims a computer enhancement of the photo allowed him to read about "victims" and a crashed disk in the old memo.")
 * THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, August 16, 1990 (not sure if that's him, but clearly not on UFO research; passing mention)
 * Delete. I'm not even sure why this article exists — maybe to avoid a red link in some other articles? -Amatulic 23:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No incoming wikilinks. ~ trialsanderrors 23:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. EyeMD 05:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Roswell is being investigated by thousands. Unless he's written a widely read book on it, don't consider this notable. JFW | T@lk  06:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteWikipedia requires a seperation of fact from fiction. The Crying Orc 08:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  I agree with User:Jfdwolff. There needs to be expanded WP:N for this particular investigator to stay, such as a published book. -- moe .RON   talk  02:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.