Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Russell (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

David Russell (artist)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant advertisement; suspect COI violation; not notable -- Gmatsuda (talk) 21:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete' He *might* be notable, however, the current article would have to be completely rewritten without all the peacock terms. As it is, yes, it appears like it is written by him or a lacky, is an advert, and is as unencyclopedic as they get.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 22:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per both - only assertion of notability is perhaps the novel. Johnbod (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

DO NOT DELETE, PAGE CORRECTED The language on the page has been changed to include only quotes from published articles and facts. Please review the article now and remove this warning. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crvenka (talk • contribs) 23:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC) — Crvenka (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Comment: Just because quotes are included doesn't mean the subject is notable or that it's not a blatant advertisement. None of the issues specified have been addressed. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete At best would require complete rewrite, assuming there's any notability there at all. Matt Deres (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established Dreamspy (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - 68.183.55.64 (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above....Modernist (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.