Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David S. Gruder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

David S. Gruder

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable. Very few, poor sources. Famousdog (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete the only book i can find in worldcat (The New IQ) is in only 60 libraries. the award specified is not a major national award.  DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | gab _ 14:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found nothing that shows notability. SL93 (talk) 21:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Claim to fame would seem to be as developer of the so-called "Politician Integrity Rating Tool." This is abysmally sourced for a BLP. Carrite (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.