Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David S. Wills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR j⚛e deckertalk 06:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

David S. Wills

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article contains one source that demonstrates notability (review of subject's book in The Korea Herald). Other sources are connected to Wills himself (his blog, etc.); there were other "sources", but they were blogs and comments on Amazon. The book itself is self-published. Insufficient independent evidence of notability, thus does not meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply not notable FarceFan (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The single review of this book is not, to me, enough to bolster its author into notability.  Self-publishing confers no notability in either fiction or blogging.  I can find no further reliable sources.  Ubelowme U  Me  19:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If the book was the subject of this article, I would have given some leeway, but since it's the author I could not find verifiable sources that give him significant coverage. Therefore delete for failing WP:GNG. - Mailer Diablo 10:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete MAde a search on Google and could no find some sources to support notability. — Hahc 21  15:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.