Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Simmons (music publisher)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

David Simmons (music publisher)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find anything, in the article or on the internet, to convince me Simmons meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. The creator is a paid editor and was paid to create this, but that doesn't say he is or is not notable. What do others think? Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * delete full of grandiose uncited claims. Unless citated then seems like a hoax. LibStar (talk) 16:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete Just not seeing RS unconnected with the subject. I sense an almost desperate need to seek validation via the article, whose sources do not treat the subject in insufficient depth or breadth to meet GNG or BIO. I thought WP:PAID's were supposed to comment on talk pages rather than actually edit? Perhaps before seeking payment for creating articles, one should familiarize oneself with inclusion criteria and search for RS on the subject first. One might want to run such an article through AfC to iron out any difficulties before going live in article space. If someone truly meets inclusion criteria, it's likely an experienced editor will write the article for the joy of doing so.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * further rant The edit summary was, "This page has been created to showcase the work that David has done including a musical about Woody Allen and one about Meyer Lanksy." That sort of thing is just something for which Wikipedia is not.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete Vanity article - borderline WP:G11. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.