Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David St. James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

David St. James

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject does not meet the notability requirements for entertainers as outlined at WP:ENT - his roles have been single appearances or extras for the most part with no significant roles in multiple productions. Note also that the article was originally created by a sock account of a blocked user. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I can't find a lot of reliable sources about this actor - tried at Google news (see link above), Rotten Tomatoes, TV guide, and NY Times. I will add the three links to the article, but there's not much out there.  I'd change my mind to a keep if a fan finds anything. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Roles seem minor (despite the peacockery). Needs substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Not quite enough references for a biographical article. Wikipedian2 (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 16:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.