Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Stuckenberg 2024 presidential campaign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The consensus here is to Delete this article but any editor is free to create a Redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 20:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

David Stuckenberg 2024 presidential campaign
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Stuckenberg, nor his campaign, have substantial media coverage from reliable and notable sources. He has been polling constantly below 10 individual votes and creating an article for his campagin opens a can of worms of making an article for every minor presidential candidate polling in the dozens Scu ba (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Military, United States of America, Florida, Massachusetts,  and Texas.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates per ATD.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Stuckenberg is on many state ballots and has made an effort to campaign. In Missouri for example, the ballot only had Stuckenberg, Trump, and Haley. In North Dakota, he came in third place behind Trump and Haley (ahead of Binkley, who himself does have an article). There has been some media coverage - light, but he's not a minor nobody that just filed to be on a ballot. GeorgeMisty (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: coming in third on a ballot and getting 24 votes on one ballot are not wikipedia-worthy. We don't have extensive coverage to get this over the notability bar. Oaktree b (talk) 02:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Expoe34 (talk) 04:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devokewater  | (tαlk) 18:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor nobody that just filed to be on the ballot. Reywas92Talk 16:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable campaign. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 19:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and others. Sal2100 (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I would vote to redirect but I'm not sure how useful that would be to readers. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * So it looks like David Stuckenberg made an account to comment on this AfD. Of course I could be wrong and it might be a fan or something. Either way, bias seems to be there. And votes to merge seem rather strange to me, as I don't know what additional content they would want at the proposed target that isn't already there. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

— DStuckenberg2024 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per WP:WTAF. If an article about the person isn't notable, their campaign surely won't be unless WP:1EVENT applies. – The Grid  ( talk )  14:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Stuckenberg is the last remaining non-withdrawn candidate on the ballot besides Trump. See []. Him and Trump are the last 2 standing! DStuckenberg2024 (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Merely standing as a candidate doesn't give notability per WP:NPOL, nothing to show that there is enough coverage of this campaign to make it notable. Shaws username  .  talk  . 18:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates. He is on the ballot in a bunch of states so it’s worth mentioning that there are non-withdrawn candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B063:AC82:FD4E:C094:689D:E954 (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - my most serious concern is one of WP:COI - either the subject, or a member of his campaign, created and/or edited this page. I join with the others concerned about lack of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete More American election season cruft. Receiving 25 votes out of 324,575 cast in New Hampshire. Less votes that people writing in ceasefire. Nearly 20 times more people wrote in Joe Biden in the Republican primary in New Hampshire than voted for this guy. Someone thought this deserved an article? Where's the significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources? AusLondonder (talk) 07:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with the 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates page. His formal registration, appearance on several state ballots, and votes received (while miniscule) are enough for a placement on that page. There is definitely not enough coverage for a separate page.Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.