Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David T. Beito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

David T. Beito
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG as the subject has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There are only two references cited on the page; one only mentions the subject in passing, and the other is an article by the subject that has no bearing on notability. The subject also does not appear to meet any of the eight criteria of Notability (academics); e.g. the article does not show that the subject "has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." Orser67 (talk) 05:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, History,  and Minnesota.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 05:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Alabama,  and Wisconsin.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of book reviews, easy pass of WP:AUTHOR. The nomination's phrasing of "only two references cited on the page" suggests a failure to perform WP:BEFORE. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Five books published by academic publishers, together with an unspecified number of academic articles ought to be enough to keep.  Peterkingiron (talk) 11:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.